Quantcast
Channel: Evidence Matters | Improving development policy and practice » mixed methods
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 6 View Live

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Of sausages and systematic reviews

“Literature reviews are like sausages… I don’t eat sausages as I don’t know what goes into them.” Dean Karlan said this to an unfortunate researcher at a conference recently. The ‘sausage problem’ puts...

View Article


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

A pitch for better use of mixed methods in impact evaluations

At the opening session of 3ie’s recent Measuring Results conference, Jyotsna Puri, Deputy Executive Director and Head of Evaluation at 3ie, said, “It takes a village to do an impact evaluation.” What...

View Article


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

M&E: A tale of two brothers

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) are always mentioned together but in practice these two disciplines pretty much evade each other. This is despite the fact that they could be highly beneficial to...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Making participation count

Toilets get converted into temples, and schools are used as cattle sheds. These are stories that are part of development lore. They illustrate the poor participation of ‘beneficiaries’ in...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Reflections on the impact of agricultural certification on well-being

Carlos Oya and colleagues recently published a systematic review of agricultural certification schemes that stands out for me as useful research for informing policy and programming. Why do I say that?...

View Article

Browsing latest articles
Browse All 6 View Live